Rank Performance Graph OS Outage
hh:mm:ss
Failed
Req%
DNS Connect First
byte
Total
1 www.choopa.com Linux 0:00:00 0.000 0.242 0.005 0.027 0.027
2 Rackspace Linux 0:00:00 0.000 0.433 0.011 0.024 0.024
3 Webair Linux 0:00:00 0.000 0.299 0.069 0.139 0.139
4 Hyve Managed Hosting Linux 0:00:00 0.000 0.151 0.076 0.151 0.151
5 CWCS Managed Hosting Linux 0:00:00 0.000 0.320 0.083 0.167 0.167
6 GoDaddy.com Inc Linux 0:00:00 0.005 0.371 0.008 0.038 0.040
7 New York Internet (NYI) FreeBSD 0:00:00 0.005 0.509 0.061 0.123 0.123
8 Bigstep Linux 0:00:00 0.005 0.212 0.082 0.163 0.163
9 ServerStack Linux 0:00:00 0.005 0.223 0.082 0.164 0.164
10 Swishmail Linux 0:00:00 0.011 0.222 0.082 0.163 0.163

See full table

Choopa.com took the top spot as the most reliable hosting company site in February. The top five hosting company sites all had no failed requests during the month, with the ranking decided by fastest average connection time. Choopa.com had the fastest connection time out of all of the top 10 hosting company websites, at just 5ms. In the past 12 months Choopa.com appeared in the top 10 nine times. Choopa.com offers a range of services including cloud hosting, dedicated hosting and colocation in its own primary facility in Piscataway, New Jersey as well as other facilities in Los Angeles, Amsterdam, and Tokyo.

Spots two and three in February go to Rackspace and Webair. Rackspace provide a wide variety of cloud services from its global network of over 50 locations in five continents, and Webair offer managed and private cloud services, storage and backup solutions from its eight facilities in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Montreal, London, Paris, Amsterdam and Singapore.

The other two hosting companies to respond to every request during February were Hyve and CWCS.

Linux continues to be the dominant operating system used by hosting company sites, with New York Internet the only site in the top 10 using FreeBSD, and the other nine using Linux.

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of around twenty leading hosting providers’ sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

From a customer’s point of view, the percentage of failed requests is more pertinent than outages on hosting companies’ own sites, as this gives a pointer to reliability of routing, and this is why we choose to rank our table by fewest failed requests, rather than shortest periods of outage. In the event the number of failed requests are equal then sites are ranked by average connection times.

Information on the measurement process and current measurements is available.

Leave a comment